If your distributor is using cost plus pricing are they getting you the best possible price for the products you are buying? Probably not! But they could be.
Todays post is by Ron Southard, CEO at SafeSourcing
A lot of distributors have told this author that reverse auctions don’t apply to them because they use the cost plus model and as such they just add their price or profit margin on top of the contract price with their source to drive their distributed price.
The fallacy in this thinking is that it may make buyers and category managers lazy in their approach to driving margin within the categories that they manage. This results in a higher price to the retailers they distribute to and ultimately to the consumer or their customers customer. A worst case scenario is that the consumer stops shopping at their customer’s store which reduces overall volume and further increases prices by not meeting volume incentives. It’s a slipper slope.
Off course this argument is relatively easy to overcome when we get around to discussing capital goods and expense related products and services area. These areas have an impact on the distributor’s net profit. And I’m sure that many of you will agree that just because one says they are a cost plus provider does not necessarily mean it’s true in the most pure sense of the definition.
Check back tomorrow and we’ll review what the real definition of cost plus is in part II.
We look forward to and appreciate your comments.
7 Responses to “Part I of II. Are reverse auctions a good tool to use in the retail distribution cost plus arena?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.