SafeSourcing Blog

click here to return to www.safesourcing.com

Archive for the ‘E-procurement Solutions’ Category

You know what they say about excuses.

Thursday, February 9th, 2012

The reason is because middle market retailers are still not using low cost e-procurement tools such as reverse auctions.

There are two primary sources of objections that continue to halt the use of these profit enhancing tools in the middle markets.

The first source is your own buyers or category managers. For some, it is the false belief that these tools will eliminate their jobs. For others, it is the thought that in rising markets, buyers tend to be conservative in the hopes that their suppliers will continue to honor old contracts and delay price increases. Neither assumption is true. E-procurement tools make a buyer’s job easier, as they can do more in less time such as working with dozens of suppliers versus only the same few they have always worked with.  Honoring old contracts almost never happens. Ever-greening of contracts is a huge problem in retail where the lack of sophisticated contract management systems that can provide automatic alerts results in literally thousands of contracts auto renewing annually at predetermined price increases. This results in huge cost increases to retailers that were not planned for. This is all the more reason to be thinking about your spend months before contracts expire even if it only results in cost avoidance.

The second area where you can expect pushback is from your incumbent suppliers or wholesale distributors. If you have never participated in the setup of an RFP or an RFQ (reverse auction) and most middle market retailers have not, that initial call to your suppliers to ask them to participate in a reverse auction event is always an interesting journey. Be prepared for all of the reasons in the world why you should not waste your time on this type of process. The more forceful the pushback the more likely you are to see savings that you should have seen earlier. As such, although suppliers may be well aware of or even using these technologies to reduce their own costs, middle tier retailers have not been able to share in these savings to the extent they deserve to.

If middle market senior executives were to lead the charge and  e-procurement costs as ell as the availability of new sources of supply were no longer an issue, there is absolutely no reason middle market retailers should not benefit greatly from running  e-procurement events such as reverse auctions.

Contact SafeSourcing if you’d like to impact this quarters earnings.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Ron Southard – CEO SafeSourcing

What the heck is Retail Spend Management? Is it the same thing as Retail e-Procurement?

Wednesday, February 8th, 2012

This generally is dependant on their own offerings which can cover the entire procure to pay process? However at it’s most basic, we are talking about e-RFX offerings such as RFI’s, RFP’s and RFQ’s  and other tools and  services that support them. So, the answer to the above is really yes and no.

My typical response to retailers is that spend management  is the management of your company’s spending across all of your operating expenses and SG&A through sophisticated tools that support RFI’s, RFP’s and RFQ’s at a minimum. Organizationally this process should report to a Chief Procurement Officer or the head of your supply chain with strong ties to the finance area. Success is typically measured by a reduction in cost of goods and services or COGS, improvement in quality or both. In retail, spend is represented in for resale products such as general merchandise, gift cards, frozen seafood, meat etc. Spend is also measured in the expense category or not for resale products and services such as supplies, services, technology, real estate etc.

According to Wikipedia, Spend management is the way in which companies control and optimize the money they spend. It involves cutting operating and other costs associated with doing business. These costs typically show up as “operating costs” or SG&A (Selling, General and Administrative) costs, but can also be found in other areas and in other members of the supply chain.

There are dozens of vendors that have a variety of tools and services that are available to assist companies in the analysis and management of their spend for the purpose of present and future decision making. These range from small boutique software houses to giant corporations. Spend management of which e-procurement tools are a part run the gamut from sophisticated contract management applications, reverse auction tools, purchase order management tools and supplier databases etc. In the most sophisticated implementations, these tools may be tightly integrated with retailers enterprise based support systems or data warehouses.

It is not a surprise that many retail companies are not really aware of what their total spend is, or how many suppliers they spend it with. In addition, many retail companies still do not use these tools today. Often times, product specifications are hard to find if documented at all and in some cases the same category might be purchased by different departments across the enterprise without aggregating the spend.

Today’s tools that supports spend management are largely available as internet based or hosted applications that re much lower cost than older in house legacy applications. As such they can be activated almost immediately. This means savings within your present accounting period is possible.

If you’d like to learn more about this process or these types of tools, please contact SafeSourcing. 

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Strategic Sourcing Techniques Using Reverse Auctions

Thursday, February 2nd, 2012

Today’s post is by Ryan Melowic Director of Customer Services at SafeSourcing.

Strategic sourcing is critical to any business owner or buyer in today’s market.  Strategic sourcing techniques that focus on getting the best deal possible when purchasing products or services should be a part of any organizations procurement strategy.  By having suppliers competing for your business it allows an organization to discover the best terms that their particular market has to offer.  Most small to mid-sized businesses don’t have the resources or connections available to discover vendors outside of their local market place. By utilizing strategic sourcing tools like reverse auctions, your organization can more effectively control costs, achieve better terms, increase value from existing purchases all while maximizing efficiencies of your purchasing process.

Reverse auctions as a sourcing strategy can have an incredible influence on an organization’s cost of operating their business which speaks directly to the bottom line.  Taking into consideration even a small cost savings on products or services can have a value increase that can significantly impact the bottom line.  Studies show that just saving 7% – 10% on procurement costs can have a direct increase on an organizations profit margin and in some cases seeing a 30% – 50% increase.  Strategic sourcing techniques using reverse auctions can be a great strategy for increasing profit margins.

The strategic sourcing technique of using reverse auctions is just one sourcing strategy that allows organizations to feel confident that they are getting the best deal possible when purchasing products and services.  Historically reserved for large corporations and multimillion dollar purchases, today’s newer reverse auction solutions, such as the one offered by SafeSourcing, allows this technique to be available to small and mid-sized businesses and for purchases of all sizes.  Representing capitalism at its best,  reverse auctions a re a strategic sourcing tool that brings competition together to have an opportunity to bid for business they may not have otherwise gotten while at the same time putting the purchasing power of an organization in a platform where these vendors compete aggressively in a real-time environment for their business.

For more information on Strategic Sourcing Techniques Using Reverse Auctions, please contact a SafeSourcing Customer Service Representative. 

We look forward to your comments.

Getting to your RFP Short list!

Monday, January 30th, 2012

Today’s post is by Mark Davis; Vice President of Operations and CTO at SafeSourcing. Mark asks

The RFI/RFP process has been the source of a few SafeSourcing blogs over the past few months and no piece is as important to the process as the plan you develop to move forward with the final stages of the RFx process, as you have companies that barely make the shortlist all of a sudden leap to the front of the pack if done right.

Today’s blog will take a look at some of the aspects that you should be thinking about when preparing for the final presentations.

Who makes the list?  – The main purpose to holding the final stage presentations is to get a final look at the vendor team that you may be getting ready to give your business too.  In almost every case, the RFx process will immediately drop a few vendors out of the mix based on their responses, their initial pricing or a combination of both.  Typically the final presentations will be given by 2 4, sometimes 5 vendors.  To have a larger list makes managing the list difficult, and generally is the stage where you have it narrowed down to companies who can truly handle your account.

What is the focus? – As you are developing the items in the next two points it will be important to develop the content for what you want to know more about.  In many cases RFIs and RFPs are unable to completely do justice for some of the details you need especially if those details revolve around a demonstration.  This is not to rehash the RFI/RFP itself but rather to dig deeper into answers that may have been confusing or not quite as complete as what you wanted.

What’s the Agenda? –  Once you know what you want to focus on and prior to holding your presentations it will be important to create the agenda you wish the vendors to follow.  Not doing so allows the vendors to present whatever they want and may leave you with more follow-up questions than you started with.  Vendors generally appreciate an agenda so that they can focus their energy on the things that are important to you.  This agenda will help be the foundation for the next two points so making it thorough without being so detailed there is no flexibility is the key to a good agenda.

How will you score it? – The final piece you will want to develop before the presentations will be a scorecard that can be distributed to the evaluation team covering every aspect that you want reviewed.  This is a critical step because not everyone will automatically evaluate the presentations in a similar way without guidance.  This can be as detailed as you want to make, however, it should at the very least follow the agenda the vendors have been given so that thoughts and comments on each point can be captured by every member of the team.

Getting ready for final RFI/RFP presentations is an important part of the evaluation process and one that should have as much thought and preparation put into it as the RFx itself.

For more information on helping your company prepare on RFI/RFP or in help preparing for final presentations, please contact a SafeSourcing Customer Service Representative.  

We look forward to your comments.

What are your e-procurement goals for the 2012?

Friday, December 23rd, 2011

As your organization enters another year what are your procurement goals and or resolutions for 2012. Below are some high level thoughts that you might use as a source of inspiration.

1. Drive lower costs.
2. Drive improved quality.
3. Insure that products are guaranteed safe.
4. Build and maintain and update high quality product specifications.
5. Find a source for vetting of unlimited new sources of supply.
6. Collaborate internally and aggregate your purchases.
7. Look at ways to use newer low cost cloud based solutions.
8. Make procurement education and training a priority.
9. Review all of your existing suppliers.
10. Collaborate with other businesses to increase savings.

Writing is a psycho, muscular, neurological process. So remember that simple goals written down are the most achievable.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

A Christmas related spend cube analogy. “Little Jack Horner sat in corner eating his Christmas Pie.”

Wednesday, December 21st, 2011

The rest of the Little Jack Horner (learn more) spend cube analogy might be changed to read like this. He stuck in his thumb and pulled out a peach and said what the heck is a peach doing in a plumb pie?

If you look to Wikipedia, there is subject definition of a spend cube. You can find information relative to spend cubes in a discussion about spend analysis. However  to the original discussion we are talking about data in this case multi-dimensional data (data cube) about spend information. Consultants love to talk about it because it allows them to charge you a lot of money without necessarily delivering any results other than, well a spend cube.

Quite frankly you are going to hear terms like data model, data warehouse, data scrubbing, data cleansing, data access, data sources and incomplete data. All of which allow consultants to charge you more money in order to develop yours from what is likely incomplete data kept in many places like GL’s, ERP systems and the like.

Once you get your model or cube, I promise you additional discovery is going to be required in order to determine what categories or products should go to market. One category manager’s category is another category mangers product. So now what?

Don’t get confused by consultants touting their spend cube analysis software because if you do, you will be in for a dime and ultimately in for a dollar and continue to get peaches when you are looking for plumbs. Ultimately the rhyme we used above is about hiding something.

If you’re totally confused, SafeSourcing can help, and we deliver results quickly. Contact a SafeSourcing representative.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

The Source of Internal Fear for Sourcing Projects

Tuesday, December 13th, 2011

Today’s post is by Mark Davis; Vice President of Operations and CTO at SafeSourcing.

Fear is the anticipation of the unknown yet assumed negative action that is about to occur. 

As it relates to sourcing, there are two very important pieces to this definition that can begin to unlock why some sourcing projects fail internally before they ever begin: the “unknown” and the “assumed negative.”  Today’s blog is going to focus on these two items as you begin to think about your 2012 projects.

Decision-Making Control – One of the greatest fears procurement departments encounter from their internal customers is the fear that they will lose control of the decision making process and that price will end up being the only thing used to evaluate the final decision.  The important thing here is a kickoff meeting to discuss the project and reassure the team that every aspect of the project from the layout, to the participants, to the actual award decision will be reviewed and approved by the business owners.  Showing the clear checkpoints for evaluation will help ease the unknown of what is to come. 

Strong vendor relationships – Vendor relationships can be the cornerstone of many companies and one that initially can create apprehension for some sourcing projects.  The key at this stage, no matter what approach is being taken (RFI, RFP, RFQ, etc.) is that the team understands that the overall goal of the project is to collect the information needed to make the decision defined in the scope.  In the process of doing this, the business must continue to operate so establishing that communication with vendors (particularly incumbents) will be handled with the upmost care.. 

Sourcing something new  – The biggest unknown and thus a big source of potential fear is the sourcing of a new item or service.  It is natural for an organization to run into some road-bumps when sourcing something new, especially a new service.  They important key here is to budget the time necessary to understand the service or item and the companies that offer it.  Many times the flow for a project like this will collect internal information through a survey, move into an RFI or RFP and if applicable wrapping up with final pricing collection.  Take it slow and you will see that new projects can actually present faster timelines and quicker final decisions.

As with any project there will always be objections and concerns from members of your organization.  Taking the time to communicate the objectives with the organization, showing them specific milestones where they will be intimately involved is the key for success as well as taking the time to gather all of the details necessary to make a final decision.  For more information on overcoming internal objections of your upcoming 2012 sourcing projects, please contact a SafeSourcing Customer Service Representative.  

We look forward to your comments.

Executive Teams, are you thinking through e-procurement self service? Think Again!

Thursday, November 3rd, 2011

Let’s also assume that you want to drive the greatest possible savings across the broadest range of categories in the shortest amount of time, like the next budget period; and have a sustainable process moving forward.

If all of the above is true, you should consider what constitutes developing full service events and whether you have the requisite headcount, specifications, strategy and research skills as well as new sources of supply to conduct the service yourself. Then there is always the question of what tool sets to use.

The question one needs to ask is; what type of event services can an e-procurement provider offer to help us get ready if we did want to do it ourselves? What we are talking about is to be 100% self-sufficient. A provider should offer readily available classroom education that can be conducted on-site in order to train your team in all the nuances of event creation and support. These skills are the foundation that allows e-procurement providers to support large volumes of events in a full service mode, which drive greater savings over the long term. They should be able to provide reference to where they have done it in the past and how much staff the reference needed to add. Ask the reference what their average savings were in year one versus what a full service provider can drive. Remember, knowledge transfer in this area is one thing; the passion, skill and headcount to carry out these practices on a day by day basis are what drive results.

This process is normally provided by people behind the scenes with a very specific skill set. If you plan to do self service it would be very wise to make sure you have them covered at the same quality level.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

What should companies do after they have addressed all of the low hanging fruit with their reverse auctions?

Friday, October 21st, 2011

Retailers ask me all the time where to begin with their reverse auctions. It might surprise you that I tell them not to necessarily place all of their focus on the expense or indirect categories by default. The fact of the matter is that for most retail companies their largest area of expense is their cost of goods. In most cases this is going to be somewhere between 65% to 75% of total revenue depending on the industry vertical. By default the gross margin line is going to be somewhere between 25% and 35%. The expense categories also contains salary and benefits which makes the spend for indirect categories actually smaller than the number represented by a companies gross margin. Historically savings on indirect or expense categories has been larger than those of products for resale. In fact it may only represent a 1/3 of the gross margin line.

As an example let’s take a look at a retailer that does $1B in gross sales and has cost of goods of 70% or $700M. This retailer’s gross margin is 30% or $300M. About $100M of that is available for e-procurement related price compression. Savings promises are really all over the board depending on what e-procurement provider you talk to and how they measure actual savings. Let’s assume you do indeed source the entire $100M in indirect spend and end up saving 15%. If (and it’s a big if) all of the savings make it to the P&L, savings would total $15M. Now let’s take a look at the cost of goods (COGS) line. All of this is available for price compression. Let’s target just 50% of the spend in year one or $350M. If we assume savings here to be only 50% of what we see in the indirect spend area or 7.5%, savings generated would total $26.25M.

With the above very hi level calculations, let’s go back to the original premise of where a company should get started. This authors answer is actually everywhere. You should use these tools in the form of e-procurement to standardize the way you conduct sourcing. Maybe you’ll drive $41.5M in savings from both direct and indirect areas.

If you’d like to understand an easy six step process to accomplish these types of results without adding staff, please contact us at SafeSourcing.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Twenty steps to running higher quality e-procurement events.

Thursday, October 20th, 2011

There are rules which if followed that will create higher quality e-procurement events for the companies and their suppliers?

Here are twenty you can begin with and then refine with others that your own team comes up with.

1. Executive sponsorship is mandatory
     a. This is required at the CEO and CFO level
2. Get the entire buying organization together for a kickoff session.
3. Provide a detailed over view of what you are going to do and the financial impact you expect it to have on the company.
4. Determine who your Subject Matter Experts are.
5. Conduct detailed data discovery sessions with all who have spend authority
6. Set specific success criteria.
7. Under stand that every event is not going to be a homerun.
8. Remember that singles and doubles score runs.
9. Create a fun environment.
10. Use scorecards to reinforce results attainment
11. Hand out E-RFX templates to gather existing product specifications.
12. Develop a standard timeline for event completion.
13. Gather an accurate list of your present suppliers.
14. Calendar your categories.
15. Prioritize by dollar value, date and strategic value.
16. Investigate existing contract language.
17. Look for auto renewal (evergreen) language and other roadblocks.
18. Determine alternate sources of supply with your sourcing company.
19. Develop a standard T& C document.
20. Assign an overall project owner
This list simply provides a format for getting started that offers suggestions that will help to create the best opportunity for reduction in cost of goods, expenses and improvement in corporate earnings. Be sure to combine this with a business partner like SafeSourcing that understands your business.
 
We appreciate and look forward to you comments.