SafeSourcing Blog

click here to return to www.safesourcing.com

Archive for the ‘Sourcing Safe Foods’ Category

Here are some simple safety steps for retail egg buyers.

Thursday, September 9th, 2010

Many of our supermarket chains and other retailers that sell fresh eggs are huge companies with thousands of locations. In order to support their customers their perishable inventory turnover has to be fast and efficient and come from multiple sources. Tracing the product to the original sources is one thing. It is entirely another thing to ensure safety and to understand not only where the product comes from but how that source conducts their business. This can and should include supplier visits and audits as well as a well structured set of questions that a farmer or distributor should be required to answer before a product goes on your shelf.

If you can’t answer some of the questions listed below, you are not being fair to your consumer or your company.

1. What type of egg farm do your eggs come from?
2. What’s the hen population of each farm?
3. What are hen living conditions such as size of cage?
4. What’s the average laying life of the hens at your source?
5. How much living space does each hen have?
6. How and what are the hens fed?
7. Do you know where the feed comes from to its original source?
8. What safety tests are conducted regularly as part of the farms business?
9. Are tests for multiple strains of salmonella conducted?
10. Has one of your supplier’s farms ever tested positive for salmonella?
11. What happens when a positive test occurs?
12. How does your farm monitor or ensure air quality for their hen population?
13. How long does it take from the time an egg is laid until it reaches the supermarket shelf?
14. How long are eggs stored prior to shipping and at what temperature?
15. What cleaning processes are used once eggs are laid?
16. Are hens caged or cage free?
17. How many inspections are conducted at the farm annually, and by whom?
18. Have any of your farms ever failed an inspection? If so why?
19. What is done to keep hens’ disease free?
20. What type of waste removal system does the farm employ?
21. Does the farm have any bio control practices in place?
22. Has the farm or farms that you source from won any awards?
23. Do the farms you source from maintain any regularly reviewed certifications?

These questions can be reworked for just about any farming environment and retail buyers that source these products should be able to do it with very little help. How much better would your company feel if they had positive responses to these questions on record for each farm in your supply chain that was regularly updated?

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

We really have to do something about food safety because the current effort is not working.

Wednesday, September 8th, 2010

The reason I post on these issues is because whatever the industry or the government is doing or more than likely not doing has to be fixed. We and by we I mean the procurement professionals of the world can fix it, but we have to hold suppliers accountable along all aspects of the supply chain. That means from raw materials, feeds and so on until the consumer uses the product safely.

How do I know that we are not learning and not applying tools that are available or asking for tools that should be available? It’s pretty simple.

Here’s an example. E.coli outbreak in beef puts focus on tougher oversight. That title comes from the September 4th 2010 edition of the Arizona Republic by Matiga Lohn of the United Press. On June 16th of 2008 this author published the following post.What’s your risk associated with the sale of tainted food? Who’s Culpable?  That post e began with I was reading the Sunday June 15th 2008 issue of The Arizona Republic and found a short article in the week in review section titled Girl’s tainted-food death brings $13 mil settlement.

Here’s the deal, I may have found this in the same newspaper some 27 months a part, but the companies involved in both cases are subsidiaries of the same conglomerate. The new article says that this incident is prompting a fresh look at tougher regulations to protect the nation’s meat supply and the undersecretary of the USDA has signaled interest in expanding federal oversight of meat beyond the most prevalent strain of e.coli. She goes on to say that our policies need to evolve to address a broader range of these pathogens. Come on. The Same Company is involved, both are similar issues and the government response is the same. So hindsight is not 20/20.

If this was an employee, it would be simple. You are fired. You did not learn from your last mistake. Please remember we have elections in the fall and a supplier that does not do their job properly can also be fired.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Retail pharmacy buyers are the prescription drugs you are sourcing safe?

Tuesday, September 7th, 2010

This author has posted recently regarding the issue of food safety in particular as it regards the recent egg recall for Salmonella outbreak. A much larger question we need ot begin asking is if we can’t control eggs in our own country how in the world we can control something as potentially dangerous as drugs. Many of these counterfeit drugs have the wrong ingredients, not enough ingredients, or are just outright fakes and tracking and tracing them from the manufacturer to the pharmacy is incredibly difficult

In the U.S.  Counterfeit drugs are being intermingled with the legitimate drugs According to the World Health Organization as much as 30 percent of prescription drugs in developing countries are counterfeit and, in developed countries, counterfeit drugs make up as much as 1 percent of the market.

As more of these products enter our market the tracking and tracing of them has to become a priority of the FDA.

There are a number of tools being considered in the area of packing alternatives inspection alternatives and RFID tagging.

As much as we pressure the FDA to do their job, and they have received additional funding for inspectors over the last several years, manufacturers also have to implement significant tracking and tracing of their products as the move along the supply chain down to the unit or container level.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Mr. President if you want to create some more jobs, hire some more FDA inspectors.

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

This author offered the following post during September of 2008.  The Food and Drug Administration fills 1300 positions. Are consumers safer?” If we were to answer that question today based on the most recent egg recall the answer would be obviously not.

So, I’m reading the Arizona Republic this past Saturday the 28th of August and come across the following article by Mary Clare Jalonick of the Associated Press. FDA to look at egg farms. The sub title was Official: Recall spurring action. You have to be kidding me. The article goes on to say that the Obama administration official says that inspectors will visit 600 large egg farms responsible for production of up to 80% of the nation’s eggs. This should be accomplished by the end of next year. Yes we mean the end of 2012. Snicker ;-(. Well I guess we are safer now.

The question this all begs is what won’t we be looking at while we are so focused on eggs. If we were really concerned, why would we not hire a bunch of new inspectors between now and the end of September of this year and train the during October of this year and then finish the project by the end of this year.. This author bets that you could find enough qualified job seekers to fill and carry out this task. I mean they are going to be following a check list relative to things like refrigeration, sanitation and standard practices. This is not brain surgery.

Hindsight is supposed to always be 20/20. If we visit wiki answers, the statement is defined as meaning that you can look in the past (hindsight) and see what you did wrong. Perfect vision is 20/20. So as you look back, you’re able to see “perfectly” what you should have done. So why does our government keep getting it wrong.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

How do you recall an egg or any product for that matter?

Thursday, August 26th, 2010

To this author it does not really matter. What does matter is that you have to be able to trace where the egg came from, what you fed your hens or fertilized your crops with and how the consumable was processed.

 There has been any number of efforts in food industry traceability during the last decade that has resulted in a number of silly naming conventions. You may have heard of a few of them. I guess this means because we have a naming convention that progress is being made.

1. From the farm to the table.
2. From the farm to the fork.
3. From the field to the fork.

In light of the most recent egg recall what on gods green earth is the government doing about building a sustainable and traceable food system. We have this conversation to often and not much happens until the next occurrence.

Product traceability that works would improve the efficiency and speed of response time following a food safety event like our most recent salmonella case. It would also contribute in a significant way to the protection of our public health and help consumer confidence following such an incident. Historically field investigators have been slowed by having to sort through paper reports and documents at numerous locations that are responsible for handing, packing and distributing these products.

Make sure that your procurement solutions provider has a good response relative to how they can help you support traceability in your procurement process.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

What type of eggs are you buying?

Wednesday, August 25th, 2010

When I was growing up the choices were not so difficult. My grandfather actually owned a dairy and poultry farm. When I visited the farms there were thousands of laying hens that my dad and grandfather owned. All of the eggs were brown and sometimes dirty before they were processed.

With the most recent salmonella outbreak, it is important to be aware of what you are buying as a consumer and as a retail buyer as well as whom you are buying them from.

There are three grades of eggs sold for the US mass market and each comes in a number of sizes.

1. U. S. Grade AA Eggs are practically free from defects and have firm yolks, thick whites, and clean and unbroken shells.
2. U.S. Grade A Eggs are practically free from defects with fairly thick whites, firm yolks, and clean and unbroken shells.
3. U.S. Grade B Eggs have thinner whites and larger, flatter yolks. The shells cannot be cracked, but they may be stained.

There are however many small farmers in the country that offer their eggs to the local neighborhoods where they live. If I were going to buy eggs from these farmers I would want to visit the farm the see the conditions the chickens live in. If I were a retail buyer, I would absolutely want to do the same thing. This author bets that one is far cleaner than the other.

Make sure your e-procurement provider supports from the farm to the table traceability.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments

Eggscuse me. How much productive time are we losing from this recall?

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

Five Hundred million is no small number. So what is Salmonella or Salmonellosis and how sick can it make you? This is not the first time we’ve seen a Salmonella outbreak in North America and it won’t be the last.

So just what is Salmonella and what if anything should consumers do to protect themselves beyond just not eating eggs?

There are about 2000 types of salmonella and about 40,000 cases are reported each year. Salmonella Typhimurium is the most common strain.  The resulting illness may begin as little as six to as many as forty eight hours after ingestion of contaminated water or food with symptoms such as nausea and vomiting which is commonly followed by diarrhea. There are examples of the illness resulting in death, but these cases are normally restricted to the very young or old or people with other underlying medical conditions.

This author discussed the 2008 United States salmonellosis outbreak extensively which began during the spring of 2008 when hundreds of people throughout the U.S. became ill after consuming contaminated food which was believed to have come from fresh Jalapeno or Serrano peppers from Mexico and raw tomatoes.

There is no vaccine to prevent salmonellosis, but you can minimize your chances of contracting it by following these steps.

1. Thoroughly cook foods to destroy the bacteria.
2. Thoroughly wash fruits and vegetables before eating them.
3. Wash your hands before handling any food.
4. If you are diagnosed with salmonellosis, be sure that you or your doctor informs. the local public health officials.
5. Separate your meats produce and dry groceries while shopping and when storing.
6. Do not keep groceries in your car while you run other errands. Take them home and refrigerate them.
7. When defrosting frozen foods, follow directions completely.
8. Avoid raw or unpasteurized milk and other dairy products.

As we have discussed previously, more work is needed in developing databases of manufacturers, suppliers, brokers, growers and products that can be searched against a variety of entities or against a variety of attributes in order to trace goods to their original source of supply quickly when outbreaks of salmonella and other food borne illnesses occur.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

This is part III of Tuesday’s post neither a leader nor a follower be.

Thursday, August 12th, 2010

Due to consumer concern about the toxic effects of BPA, Japanese manufacturers voluntarily reduced the use of BPA in packaging between 1998 and 2003.

They replaced EXR coating with PET film lamination on the inner surface of cans or used an EXR paint that had much less BPA migration into food instead.

And following these reduction and replacement moves, a team of assessors claim that virtually no BPA is found in canned foods and drinks in Japan now.

I hope everyone caught the fact that this was done between 1998 and 2003 and we are still discussing this problem six years later. The fact is that some of the same companies we are speaking of also sell products in Japan.

So what might enlightened leaders do? Following is a very high level less than all inclusive examples.

1. Accept the fact that there is a problem.
2. Conduct research from other sources such as Japan that have eliminated BPA leakage.
3. Author a plan to replace existing products with new ones that are safer.
4. Willingly incur the added expense to retool processes and manufacturing products that are required to support the change.
5. Author a marketing campaign to tell consumers what you have done on their behalf relative to product safety.
6. Let consumers know what your competition is not doing.

A leader behind this plan might in fact increase market share and also sleep better at night.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

This is part II of yesterday’s post neither a leader nor a follower be.

Wednesday, August 11th, 2010

As a refresher, this author used the following example of less than stellar industry leadership during yesterdays post. I was reading an article recently Titled “Firms aim to fight BPA ban” by Lyndsey Layton of the Washington Post. A quote from the article that follows speaks volumes to the lack of leadership in solving this problem. “Frustrated industry executives huddled for hours Thursday trying to figure out how to tamp down public concerns over the chemical bisphenol A, or BPA”. You have to be kidding me.

So, let’s dig a little deeper into this article and suggest how industry leaders should be looking at this as an opportunity and how they can help buyers from all companies  source products that are safer and have a better impact on the environment instead of continuing to follow the same practices they have been since the 1950’s.

The firms we are talking about are manufacturers of canned beverages and foods. This includes well known industry giants. A sampling of the creative strategy  they came up with was based on the believe that they needed to have a legislative approach (lobbying) and a grass roots outreach to mothers and students between the age of 21 and 35 from someone in the age group. They also considered using fear tactics or telling consumers you will have to pay a higher price for these products. I won’t go on. Simply stated this is poor leadership based on a traditional business model with very little thought as to anything other than business as usual. At the end of the day, the product is not safe and needs to be replaced or outlawed.

Last year, scientists from the US National Toxicology Programme said that effects on reproductive development from BPA in packaging cannot be ruled out and a study released last year by UK scientists linked the chemical to diabetes and heart disease.
This is in addition to the 100 other studies that have found the chemical to be an endocrine disrupter or damaging to behavioural and neural development.

Michael Brown, President of chemical consulting firm StrategyMark said, alternatives such as acrylic, polyester, and polypropylene are worthwhile exploring in a number of applications such as non-packaging water sports bottles, baby bottles, water dispensing bottles, appliance containers (e.g. food processors), etc.

Of course it makes sense, but even a consulting firm that supports this industry won’t come right out and say this is a required and mandatory action.

Tomorrow in Part III of this post we’ll take a look at how another country dealt with the same issue.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Let’s revisit an updated post from last year titled “Neither a leader nor a follower be”.

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

With BPA back  in the news and chief executives leaving  the biggest companies in the world let’s take a look at what we would all like to see or not see from our leaders.

Middle of the road does not work. The same old same old does not work. The pace with which change occurs today requires companies to be able to turn on a dime. For that leadership is required. Not leadership that only looks at the bottom line. We require leadership that creates and innovates to both your benefit and that of the global community.

The leadership this author is speaking about is visionary actionable leadership. Not reactionary leadership. We need leadership that looks at the sate of their company and its products as well as the needs of the community at large and in offering their solution to the collective problems faced by these entities, does it better, faster, cheaper and for the general good. This is more about walking the walk before any one else does because it is the right thing to do. If these represent the guiding principles of a company, the money part will follow. This is not something that can be learned or taught in business school.

According to Wikipedia, leadership has been described as the “process of social influence in which one person can enlist the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of a common task”.

A second definition which I like better and is more inclusive of followers comes from Alan Keith of Genentech who said “Leadership is ultimately about creating a way for people to contribute to making something extraordinary happen.

As an example of less than stellar industry leadership, let’s look at a recent news article on a subject this author has posted about on a number of occasions “BPA”. I was reading an article recently Titled “Firms aim to fight BPA ban” by Lyndsey Layton of the Washington Post. A quote from the article that follows speaks volumes to the lack of leadership in solving this problem. “Frustrated industry executives huddled for hours Thursday trying to figure out how to tamp down public concerns over the chemical bisphenol A, or BPA”. You have to be kidding me.

In tomorrows post let’s dig a little deeper into this article and suggest how industry leaders should be looking at this specific opportunity that has now grown beyond can linings and plastic bottles; and how they can help buyers from all companies source products that are safer and have a better impact on the environment instead of continuing to follow the same practices they have been since the 1950’s.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.