Archive for December, 2009

Just what can’t companies source using reverse auctions?

Monday, December 7th, 2009

We were speaking with a consultant this morning that asked us a group of questions from a company he was in the process of introducing us to. Two of the questions were related and are as follows.

1. Does it make sense to reverse auction any of our core items?
2. Does it ever make sense not to reverse auction?

Obviously our first conversation centered on what were considered to be core items for this company. This can change from company to company based on the specific industry they serve and understanding frequently used buzz words for that particular industry.

In the retail industry, products are generally broken down into two major groups or classifications which are products for resale and products not for resale. Core items can exist in both categories. An example of a not for resale product/category that a large retailer may consider to be core might be fuel. This is a regular annual expense item that is driven overall by the price of a barrel of oil that can vary widely and be purchased as part of an annual contract that can be tied to a price index such as OPIS. Additionally, fuel can be purchased using spot buys that can be made periodically during the year and are also tied to the same index. Both types of buys lend themselves very nicely to the reverse auction process.

For a manufacturer, a core product might include the raw materials used to manufacture their end user products. This might include metals, plastics, resins etc. All of these core products are also tied closely to a variety of indexes.

The key to using reverse auctions to source any product/category is the quality and availability of the products specification, the availability of alternative or new sources of supply wanting to bid for the business and the quality of the new product compared to what is being used today.

With the above issues covered and understanding that all other data normally considered during the standard procurement process are generally features of most quality e- negotiation tools; companies can be comfortable that any product or service that they use can be sourced using a reverse auction.

Typically when using a reveres auction element of an RFX suite, companies can save time, review more bids and compress pricing or avoid costs in an up market.

We appreciate and look forward to your comments.

Just what can?t companies source using reverse auctions?

Monday, December 7th, 2009

We were speaking with a consultant this morning that asked us a group of questions from a company he was in the process of introducing us to. Two of the questions were related and are as follows.

1.?Does it make sense to reverse auction any of our core items?
2.?Does it ever make sense not to reverse auction?

Obviously our first conversation centered on what were considered to be core items for this company. This can change from company to company based on the specific industry they serve and understanding frequently used buzz words for that particular industry.

In the retail industry, products are generally broken down into two major groups or classifications which are products for resale and products not for resale. Core items can exist in both categories. An example of a not for resale product/category that a large retailer may consider to be core might be fuel. This is a regular annual expense item that is driven overall by the price of a barrel of oil that can vary widely and be purchased as part of an annual contract that can be tied to a price index such as OPIS. Additionally, fuel can be purchased using spot buys that can be made periodically during the year and are also tied to the same index. Both types of buys lend themselves very nicely to the reverse auction process.

For a manufacturer, a core product might include the raw materials used to manufacture their end user products. This might include metals, plastics, resins etc. All of these core products are also tied closely to a variety of indexes.

The key to using reverse auctions to source any product/category is the quality and availability of the products specification, the availability of alternative or new sources of supply wanting to bid for the business and the quality of the new product compared to what is being used today.

With the above issues covered and understanding that all other data normally considered during the standard procurement process are generally features of most quality e- negotiation tools; companies can be comfortable that any product or service that they use can be sourced using a reverse auction.

Typically when using a reveres auction element of an RFX suite, companies can save time, review more bids and compress pricing or avoid costs in an up market.

We appreciate and look forward to your comments.

Who’s managing your suppliers?

Friday, December 4th, 2009

Supply base management is the next major addition to strategic sourcing suites. All vendors do not offer this functionality today; in fact some have trouble describing what it is. Although elements of this functionality exist within a variety of surround type service offerings, no one vendor offers complete functionality in this area today. A significant reason for this is the suppliers concern with the thought of being managed in the first place. Additionally, retailers, suppliers nor e-procurement solution providers have agreed as to what the correct Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) should be. As these tools are developed, the most successful supply base management tools will be those that can manage the largest supplier database to the continual benefit of both retailers and suppliers that participate in their events. In a best case scenario, high quality suppliers will get invited to more events, earn incremental business and save retailers both money and time on a continuous basis while also supporting other retail areas of interest such as safety and green initiatives.

This author believes that the most probable result of this process will be a set of automated robust supplier scorecards that monitor and report on supplier performance versus a range of KPI’S that are applied against well known quality guidelines such as Total Quality Management (TQM), Six Sigma etc. resulting in continuous improvement in e-procurement events and growth in the amount of spend under management by retailers.

As always, we look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Who?s managing your suppliers?

Friday, December 4th, 2009

Supply base management is the next major addition to strategic sourcing suites. All vendors do not offer this functionality today; in fact some have trouble describing what it is. Although elements of this functionality exist within a variety of surround type service offerings, no one vendor offers complete functionality in this area today. A significant reason for this is the suppliers concern with the thought of being managed in the first place. Additionally, retailers, suppliers nor e-procurement solution providers have agreed as to what the correct Key Performance Indicators (KPI?s) should be. As these tools are developed, the most successful supply base management tools will be those that can manage the largest supplier database to the continual benefit of both retailers and suppliers that participate in their events. In a best case scenario, high quality suppliers will get invited to more events, earn incremental business and save retailers both money and time on a continuous basis while also supporting other retail areas of interest such as safety and green initiatives.

This author believes that the most probable result of this process will be a set of automated robust supplier scorecards that monitor and report on supplier performance versus a range of KPI?S that are applied against well known quality guidelines such as Total Quality Management (TQM), Six Sigma etc. resulting in continuous improvement in e-procurement events and growth in the amount of spend under management by retailers.

As always, we look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Something may be rotten next year!

Thursday, December 3rd, 2009

Product safety efforts can sometimes be confounding when related security issues have an overriding priority. In this case we are talking about product spoilage because of a 2007 freight screening law for bombs prior to the freight being allowed on aircraft. If enough spoilage takes place to perishable products shipped to the U.S. from around the world, not only could we have a shortage of products such as fruits and vegetables, but prices could also rise significantly based on a shortage of the products. For the products that do make it to market in sellable shape there is also an increased risk of food borne illness due to a lack of sanitary inspection techniques for raw consumables such as produce at air cargo facilities.

The cost issue may be something we have to bare regardless of the security issues because the only way around it for supply chain members is to impose more strict security processes on their own that meet the proper guidelines and there is a cost associated with that too. Suppliers, producers and wholesalers have all know about this for more than two years so there has been adequate time to prepare.

However if you find a shortage next year of what you are looking for on your perishable shopping list or you see a sudden rise the cost of airline tickets. The answer just might be that your government is just trying to keep us safe.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Are you guilty of Greenwashing?

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

Basically, to greenwash is to pay lip service to something to make it seem like you are involved without actually conducting any practice or process that supports said lip service.

On June 18th of 2008 post the Doctor at Sourcing Innovation described green washing as a practice used by a company to mislead consumers about the environmental benefits of a product or service. This can apply to any person or company in the sourcing cycle of life which includes retailers, suppliers, manufacturers, brokers, and vendors that provide the tools that bind this circle.

By way of example, at SafeSourcing we have a corporate social responsibility program we call R5. The first three of the five R?s refer to the Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle terms that all green focused organizations are familiar with. Additionally, we have added Reward and Renew. By reward we mean that we will contribute annually to the safety and environmentally focused organizations that our customers support through their initiatives?. This reward will be based in part on the vote of our customers. By renew we mean that we will continue this cycle annually and support it in all of our products, programs and practices.

Greenwashing can take a variety of forms such as linking to green websites or using green terminology without any practical application associated with it. If you are a retailer, ask your supplier?s, vendors and business partners what their green programs are. Compare their programs with yours and then learn from each other. Pay this support forward by rewarding suppliers, vendors and business partners that share and support your social consciousness.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.