Archive for the ‘Sourcing Safe Foods’ Category

Traditionalist retailer thinking says e-negotiation tools will never work for them.

Friday, November 6th, 2009

On many occasions I have discussed the various benefits of using e-negotiation tools with retailers. I still believe that the primary benefit to any retailer if they were to assign twenty percent of their above the gross margin line spend to these types of tools could be an increase in their net earnings of up to 100%.

Beyond an earnings improvement however many of the following benefits could also take place.

1. They would continue to source high quality products.
2. They would continue to have great supplier relationships.
3. They would free up time to do other tasks.
4. They would improve their company?s net earnings by up to 100%.
5. They would support our fragile environment.
6. They would support global food and product safety initiatives.
7. They would have a larger audience of piers to converse with daily.
8. They would have a single source of information about their profession.
9. They would be instantly alerted to product recalls.
10. They would support a traceable supply chain.
11. They would have an endless source of new suppliers to review easily.
12. They would have product specifications at their finger tips.

You might be wondering why many companies are not enjoying these benefits today The following are common objections you might hear daily from procurement knowledge workers that have not been exposed to e-negotiation tools in the past.

1. We already get the best cost.
2. We?ve done business with our supplier for years.
3. We don?t have product specifications.
4. We don?t have time for this.
5. Switching costs will be too high.
6. We can?t insure the same quality.
7. We need to adhere to certain standards.

If you don?t feel that these benefits would support both corporate goals and underlying CSR initiatives, give us a call and we?ll make you a hero and get you promoted.

As always, we look forward to and appreciate your comments

Stimulus Dollars Abused? Do we need another BPA study?

Friday, October 30th, 2009

When we live through an economic condition like we have had to for the last couple of years. An economic condition that requires stimulus dollars from the government to get it kick started, how in the world Thirty Million Dollars ($30,000,000.00) of those funds can be approved for studying BPA.

We can?t event get banks to approve loans to small business which we all know are the heart of any sustainable economic growth. But we can allocate this absurd amount of money so that The National Institute of Health can study BPA.

This author thought these funds were to stimulate the economy. According to the researchers part of the study will look to see if exposures to Bishenol A can affect multiple generations. The key word here is generations. This probably means there will most likely be more money spent in the future.

As this author has discussed in a number of posts, Bisphenol A or BPA is a chemical that is used in plastics such as baby bottles and as a lining of metal cans used for food distribution.

If you were to Google BPA, you would receive 6,000,000 hits. If you were to Google Bisphenol A you would receive another 2,000,000 hits. In this data you can find where other countries have banned the use of the chemical and or found alternatives to this chemical because they have data that indicates what this new study is looking to review again.

Well, it is Halloween season and it continues to scare the heck out of this author as to how the economic stimulus dollars continue to be mismanaged.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Northern Exposure. Explaining The Canadian Food Safety Institute.

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

The Canadian Food Safety Institute (CFSI) was created and developed after series of exploratory meetings and consultations. The Canadian General Standards Board (CGSB) in Ottawa and others in the Canadian food industry have raised the issue of the lack of trained certified Food Safety Auditors in Canada. Food Inspectors, Auditors and Consultants programs are available at various fees and rates. Also ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 auditors and consultants are available to food organizations that need them. However, job postings and request for proposals for Food Safety Auditors have sometimes achieved only one or two fully certified candidates.

Safesourcing follows the actions and guidance of CFSI in our supplier research and certification process. If you are interested in sponsorship or membership of this organization please visit their website www.canadianfoodsafetyinstitute.ca

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.