Archive for the ‘Online Reverse Auction’ Category

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

How should companies decide what products and services can go through the e- negotiation process?

Monday, April 19th, 2010

There really is no reason to shy away from taking any product or service to reverse auction as part of your overall e-negotiation strategy to compress pricing.

There are however some simple questions companies can ask themselves when considering any product, service, or category for consideration in the e-negotiation process. Several but not all of those questions would certainly include the following three.

1. How many suppliers are available and willing to bid on your business?

It?s obvious your company is already aware of your incumbent suppliers. The more important question is what other suppliers are available and how can you find them.
Several will exist within you own geographical area that you are not even aware of. Many others may be located across the country that are also very interested in earning your business.

2. Does your company have the complete detailed product specifications for this product or service readily available or are you familiar with a source from which you can get them easily?

Are your products specifications kept in some form of central repository or are they in the mind of your buyer? This is the single largest obstacle to successful e-negotiation events.

3. How much of the product or service are you willing to commit to buy over what period of time?

What period of time are you buying for? Is there an opportunity to contract for a longer period of time in order to raise volumes? Is there an opportunity to aggregate dissimilar products in order to increase the e-auction size?

If you are well prepared, there are suppliers willing to bid for your business that offer quality equal to or better than what you are presently receiving for your products and services at a better price and with better service. That?s win-win-win.

We always look forward to and appreciate your comments

Posted in , , , , , , ,

Retailers need to think it through before trying a do it yourself program when it comes to e-negotiation or e-procurement

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

This author has met with many large companies that are using e-sourcing suites or tools provided by some of the largest names in the industry. After we have reviewed what we do and how we do it and then compare what they are accomplishing the following question always comes up. Why are you generating significantly higher savings than we are?

The answer is pretty simple in most cases. You have bought a software suite or tools and rather than using them as designed you have just incorporated your old practices into new tools. In addition, further training or access to your supplier?s data in the form of sources of supply etc. was not included in your initial cost.

A full service solution provider should be able to create, execute and support all auction activity including but not limited to the following.

1.?Assistance in selecting Auction categories
2.?Market insight
3.?Determine the timing of category auction
4.?Identification of potential quality suppliers in addition to existing
5.?Building on-line auctions
6.?Supplier contacts and training
7.?Execution of live bids
8.?Trouble shooting during live bids
9.?Compiling and communicating reports within 24 hours
10.?Award and Non-Award notifications to Suppliers
11.?Providing ongoing customer support
12.?Monitoring Supplier performance
13.?Feedback from Retailers/Suppliers
14.?Analyze the quality of each auction

The above deliverables if not executed in a self service program will result in less than maximum results and potentially failure of your program.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Posted in , , , , , , , , , ,

Part II of II. Is critical thinking in supplier selection a key to quality and sustainable retail reverse auctions?

Friday, April 2nd, 2010

Continuing from Part I of II Is critical thinking in supplier selection a key to quality and sustainable retail reverse auctions?

The following scenario offers one example as to how the careful management of your suppliers and a little strategic thinking can drive the type of results you desire as well as a long term sustainable process.

Suppliers will almost always not be of the same size. This does not mean however that they are not of the same quality. Smaller vendors that have accepted your invitation will most likely bid early during your event and then drop out after the early rounds. These suppliers will most likely not agree to participate in the future as they consider their chances of winning the business unrealistic. This too is manageable however back to our first premise. Suppliers that finish first or second or your incumbent that may have been replaced will in most cases agree to participate again, but? a lack of new competition will make the auctions less successful.

Thinking more strategically, an apparently logical question might be… If we only have six suppliers available how many should we invite to participate the first time and is more always better over the long run? Should we invite them all? Every company will answer this question differently. When considering the future, do we want successful early events or would we like a continual process improvement that drives continuous savings?

There are several possible solutions to consider. One scenario might be to only invite four participants to your first event. This will create a competitive environment for your reverse auction. After all it only takes two suppliers both interested in your business to drive quality results. Now back to our story. Let?s make the assumption that in twelve months or in the next purchasing cycle when you wish to repeat this auction that the two largest suppliers from the previous event agree to return. You could now invite supplier?s number five and six that were not included in the original auction. You have now created a competitive auction for the second year or purchasing cycle. An additional thought might be to not invite all of the largest suppliers to your first reverse auction, in order to manage the quality of your suppliers for future auctions. This type of critical thinking supports continual process improvement in e-procurement implementations.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Posted in , , , , , , , , ,

Why do we hear that reverse auctions are not as successful the 2nd time around?

Friday, March 19th, 2010

As we discuss this further, one area of commonality they frequently discuss is a lack of new suppliers. Another is the price being too high for the same event that has already been built and will result in lower savings the 2nd and 3rd time around.

A simple focal point to begin a discussion of this issue is the lack of availability or the related benefit of a large retail specific supplier database. However unless we discuss how? retail companies should use this type of data when available is just as important if there is a true desire in growing their percent of spend with e-negotiation tools?

There is a proper way to insure the sustainability of your e-negotiation events going forward. Following these guidelines will also encourage senior management to consider placing more spend under the control of e-negotiation tools and specifically reverse auction tools. Armed with a robust retail supplier database and related tools:

1.?Conduct a detailed category discovery
???? a.?Learn all there is to learn about the way a company conducts their?? business.
???? b.?Walk distribution centers and warehouses
???? c.?Walk an array of stores and understand all formats of the enterprise.
???? d.?Compile a list of all corporate categories
2.?Rank categories by
???? a.?Total spend
???? b.?Importance
???? c.?Sourcing frequency
???? d.?Quality objectives
???? e.?Look for aggregation opportunities.
3.?Conduct supplier discovery
???? a.?Rank suppliers
??????? i.?Size
??????? ii.?Experience
??????? iii.?References
??????? iv.?Environmental certifications
??????? v.?Safety Certifications
4.?With? the above in hand; develop a three year game plan
???? a.?Identify suppliers for each event over the three years
???? b.?Develop savings targets by category
???? c.?Develop a three year time line for all categories
5.?Role Play internally? the first year for a test category
???? a.?Ask the following questions
???????? i.?How will you award the business
???????? ii.?Review alternate scenarios
???????? iii.?Review savings by scenario
???????? iv.?Determine which suppliers will be invited back
???????? v.?Determine what new suppliers from your database search will be invited to participate next year

Now ask your e-procurement solutions provider to demonstrate their capability in this area

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Posted in , , , , , , , ,

How does a price index play into e-procurement practices?

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

From a simplistic perspective an index is a system used to make finding information easier. There are any numbers of indexes or indices available to help procurement knowledge workers insure they are sourcing products at the best possible pricing. The key word here is price as what we will be discussing are specifically price indices.

According to Wikipedia a price index (plural: ?price indices? or ?price indexes?) is a normalized average (typically a weighted average) of prices for a given class of goods or services in a given region, during a given interval of time. It is a statistic designed to help to compare how these prices, taken as a whole, differ between time periods or geographical locations.

Price indices have several potential uses. For particularly broad indices, the index can be said to measure the economy’s price level or a cost of living. More narrow price indices can help producers with business plans and pricing. Sometimes, they can be useful in helping to guide investment.

Normally an index reflects the current and historical price of a variety of commodities ranging from metals to grain. A common index used in sourcing petroleum products is OPIS or the Oil Price Information Service which you can learn more about by visiting www.opisnet.com.? However in order to drive the best possible fuel pricing there are other dependencies such as whether you are doing spot buys or bulk purchases and these strategies will determine what specific index you would want to review as well as it?s relation to other product information sources such as Platts or the Gulf Coast spot assessments.? This will put you in a better position to determine how to bid the product and also earn a discount relative to the lowest common denominator.

All other commodities have similar sourcing issues dependant on what the highest cost item is in their product makeup. An example here might be the cost of grain in the feeding of cattle or poultry.

Ask you solution provider to explain these tools to you and to recommend how you might use them toward the best outcome.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments

Posted in , , , , , , , , , , ,

Retailers, how many of your e-procurement contracts contain evergreen language?

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

In this case your supplier wins because your contract contains evergreen language. Some retailer?s think this is a good thing and it could be. Paired with other language that might identify escalator or de-escalator language that protects both the supplier and the buyer against abnormal commodity increases this could be win-win. The bigger issue is who is responsible for monitoring the dates and how will you be alerted if the adjustments don?t take place?

This begs the question; just what are are evergreen clauses within a contract and what do you need to do to be careful with them.

According to Black?s Law Dictionary an Evergreen contract is a contract that renews itself from one term to the next in the absence of contrary notice by one of the parties.

The potential problem with an ?evergreen? clause in your contract is that this type of contract automatically renews at the end of the contract term, unless one of the parties notifies the other party that it does not want to renew the contract.? This notice normally must be given within a specified time period such as 60 to 90 days prior to the end of the current contract term. This takes us back to who is going to monitor this time frame and alert you to the fact that something is required?

A significant step in conducting quality e-negotiation events is to understand the contracts you are wishing to negotiate.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Posted in , , , , , , ,

Just what is Strategic Sourcing?

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

Let?s?look first at strategy in general.

As a former military procurement guy if we think of strategy from a military perspective, how an actual battle is fought is a matter of tactics: the terms and conditions that it is fought under or whether it should be fought at all is a matter of strategy.

The next logical step would be to understand that a strategic plan is a way to define a company?s strategy. When this author goes about developing a strategic plan I tend to lean in the direction of aligning my thoughts so that they are in concert with my three basic necessities or tenants of running a business which obviously includes sound fiscal guidelines. The tenants are.
?
1. A long-range strategic plan
2. A tactical plan
3. A talent management plan

The ultimate goal is not to do something just to do it, but to do it as a way of beating or avoiding competition and growing at the same time. Think of Dollar Stores in terms of how they avoid competing with Wal-Mart although they are in a very similar space.

If we believe the above, how do we relate that back to Strategic Sourcing?

Strategic Sourcing should be a discipline used to identify, examine, select and implement a variety of sourcing alternatives for? specific groups or categories by evaluating, selecting and collaborating with your sources of? supply in order to achieve improvements in quality, cost, operational efficiency and other benefits that support a companies overall strategic plan. To that end just lowering the purchase price is not necessarily strategic in and of itself.

Some say that based on that definition and an understanding of strategy that Reverse Auctions therefore are not strategic. This author says that depends. If Reverse auctions? are the result of significant discovery and analysis that focuses on identifying the best opportunities to support a strategic objective and it is the result of using the entire RFX sequence, it may in fact be strategic but it could also just be tactical. This author believes we are splitting hairs.

After all one mans pill is another mans poison.

We look forward to and appreciate you comments.
.

Posted in , , , , , ,

Hey Retailers, what is your 2010 business strategy and how does e-procurement enter into it?

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

The business of e-negotiation and in particular reverse auctions has many benefits for retailers that support their business strategies.

According to Wikipedia, a business model is a framework for creating economic, social, and/or other forms of value. The term business model is thus used for a broad range of informal and formal descriptions to represent core aspects of a business, including purpose, offerings, strategies, infrastructure, organizational structures, trading practices, and operational processes and policies.

Often times during this author?s discussion with retailers the question comes up as to the benefits of the reverse auction business model or that of other e-procurement events such as Requests for Information or RFI?S.

I have never spoken to a retail executive that does not have as a significant pillar of their business strategy to increase profitability even if it takes reducing losses in the early stages of a turn around. Reverse auctions if run properly can reduce the cost of goods category, the expense category and hired services that impact both areas. They can also continue to reduce the same year after year and the savings are predictable.

This author will make the assumption that there is common? agreement that price compression in today?s world is critical and that the reduction in cost of goods and services is the largest area of opportunity on a retail P&L. As such, there are a number of reasons that the reverse auction business model works well within organizations that should drive the strategic growth in utilization of this business model within retail.

A few and certainly not all are listed below in no particular order…

1.?A larger number of suppliers: Because of an increased number of suppliers bidding for a retailers business, getting a relatively low price is a given. The suppliers benefit because of the potential reduction is selling costs and easy access to new sources of business which encourages them to lower their pricing.
2.?Location, Location, Location: In this case, location no longer matters. A supplier can participate from wherever they happen to be located. This opens up new potential markets for the supplier and new sources of supply for retailers.
3.?It?s like a game: Participating suppliers wait to see if their price is the lowest much the same way a gambler would wait to see the turn of the next card when playing blackjack or poker. This is a social interaction and dynamic that builds on itself and can drive a larger number of bids and extensions while ultimately leading to lower pricing.
4.?Early success drives a virtual circle for retailers and suppliers: The more a retailer uses the tool and the more success suppliers have with securing new business resulting from this process, the more the process will drive retailers to host new events and suppliers to participate in them again and again. Independent departmental successes can spread quickly within a retail company such that other departments not using the process do not want to be left out of potential savings opportunities and notoriety.

As always, we look forward to and appreciate? your comments.

Posted in , , , , , , ,

Retail e-procurement savings. How many times have we heard we can do it better ourselves?

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

And for those very large retail companies that have very expensive internal tools that were sold to you by the largest players in the space. Ask yourself why your event savings are much less than those reported by companies who have outsourced this functionality? If you want to drive the greatest possible savings across the broadest range of categories in the shortest amount of time; and have a sustainable process moving forward keep reading..

The question one needs to ask is; what type of event services does my e-procurement provider offer? If your company is deciding to try self service, which is to be 100% self-sufficient, you need to know if your provider offers readily available classroom education that can be conducted on-site in order to train your team in all the nuances of event support. These skills are the foundation that allows e-procurement providers to support large volumes of events in a full service mode, which drive greater savings over the long term. Knowledge transfer in this area is one thing; the passion, skill and headcount to carry out these practices on a day by day basis are what drive results.

Typically event services falls into two broad categories:

1. Event management
2. Event monitoring and support.

Event management provides end to end e-sourcing support that begins with a companies overall strategy and ends with the actual execution of the e-procurement event. This is a true cross category effort that includes a rather lengthy list of services that may include buyer training, supplier selection, category discovery, supplier communication, the strategy for taking a category to market, training and overall supplier expectation management.

Event monitoring and support is actually the tactical implementation of the over all e-procurement event management process. This may include all communications with suppliers on the day of an event including making sure they have access to the system, get logged in properly, don?t have problems placing quotes, monitoring supplier and buyer system communications techniques during an event such as notes and texting and being available post event for questions as needed.

These services are normally provided by people behind the scenes with a very specific skill set. If you plan to do self service it would be very wise to make sure you have them covered at the same quality level.

As always, we look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Posted in , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Why use E-Negotiation, e-Procurement or Strategic Sourcing tools?

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

This author has discussed on many occasions the various benefits to retailers of using e-negotiation tools. Not the least of which is significant profit improvement. Simply put if a retailer were seriously to assign twenty percent of their above the gross margin line spend to these types of tools, they could increase their net earnings by up to 100%. In addition, much of the following would also happen.

1.?They would continue to source high quality products.
2.?They would continue to have great supplier relationships.
3.?They would free up time to do other tasks.
4.?They would improve their company?s net earnings by up to 100%.
5.?They would support our fragile environment.
6.?They would support global food and product safety initiatives.
7.?They would have a larger audience of piers to converse with daily.
8.?They would have a single source of information about their profession.
9.?They would be instantly alerted to product recalls.
10.?They would support a traceable supply chain.
11.?They would have an endless source of new suppliers to review easily.
12.?They would have product specifications at their finger tips.

If you are wondering why most companies are not enjoying these benefits, the following are the objections we to often hear during initial discovery meetings with managers that have not been exposed to e-negotiation tools in the past.

1.?I already get the best cost.
2.?We?ve done business with this supplier for years.
3.?I don?t have product specifications.
4.?I don?t have time for this.
5.?Switching costs will be too high.
6.?I can?t insure the same quality.
7.?We need to adhere to certain standards.
8.?What about my relationships.

One thing you may notice is that the companies almost always include me or I and almost never we. To much individual emphasis is not a good thing. Healthy skepticism is. If you have an objection that is not listed above, or they pretty much fit your thinking, please review the dozen benefits above and weigh your objections against them.

As always, we look forward to and appreciate your comments

Posted in , , , , , , ,

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »
© 2025 SafeSourcing