Archive for the ‘Strategic Sourcing’ Category

Don’t be like Mike…Be Like Steve (Jobs) – Part II of II

Friday, July 26th, 2013

Today’s post is by Mark Davis; Sr. Vice President and COO at SafeSourcing.

In yesterday’s blog we looked at some of the well-known reasons that Steve Jobs was one of the most successful leaders of all time and how they are closely connected to being successful in other areas such as procurement.  We will wrap up this two-part series today by looking at four more reasons why Steve Jobs was successful and how they resonate in the procurement world.

Never stop learning– Steve Jobs and many, many other successful business people have shown that a dedication to learning and continued pursuit of knowledge will never be wasted.  There are few places this is truer than in procurement where services, goods and equipment are being purchased every day with a speed impossible to keep up with.  The only way procurement managers can be successful is to pursue the knowledge to help them understand the categories they source.   Whether this comes from periodicals, the internet, books, television programs or through conversations with people smarter than they are about a topic, it must happen.  Only in knowing everything they can about something can they expect to succeed at handling any part of it; this includes the markets affecting it, the conditions of the world that can influence and the environment of one’s company that can make it or kill it if the knowledge is not known in advance.

Develop strong supporting teams– This reason of Steve Jobs’ success is almost the antithesis of the point above.  There are things someone knows, things they can learn and then there are people who are going to know more and be better than they are.  Projects need these people to be successful and managers need to be smart enough to admit it.  In the procurement world this translates frequently to involving a Subject Matter Expert.  The most successful projects are those with good management and great knowledge of what must be done to complete it in a manner that will deliver the company what it needs to make decisions.  Most managers who have been in this space more than 5 years know how to source but that does not mean they understand the details or specifications behind everything they will be asked to assist in sourcing, requiring the need of a strong external partner, or internal resource, or both to see the project through.

Be willing to take a risk– Virtually every risk becomes either a mistake or a triumph that rises above the path not taking the risk becomes.  To the procurement professional the meaning of this is clear.  Continuing to source a few categories a year, while others evergreen, collecting the three paper quotes and negotiating from there is a standard and safe way to move ahead.  It produces reliable, although modest, results.  The risk would be to depart from this model; to pursue tools and processes and partners that can help turn 8% savings into 25%.  Calculated risks that can be planned for and understood can produce great results in many cases and learning experiences in every case.

Don’t wait– The sadness of Steve Jobs life and so many people like him that leave this world before it is ready for them to is the hole that appears when they are gone.  This happens so quickly that what was unchanging becomes changed in an instant.  It is for these reasons that every category and every potential project should be reviewed for opportunity regularly.  Business landscapes change, companies are purchased, natural disasters occur regularly that affect a business.  If a contract ends in three months it should be beginning the review process now to make sure deadlines and contract dates for change (if that happens) can be honored and so that data can be collected to ensure a strong view of options.  Waiting to review upcoming categories may end up creating missed opportunities to save or to strengthen contracts already in place.

This blog series could easily have been written about any area of human existence.  Planning with strong teams that are bright and pursue perfection is the start of greatness especially when they do not wait for the opportunity but are willing to take a risk to seize it.  While few would claim to achieve the success Steve Jobs did, these ideals can be put into action with any sourcing project a company has.  For more information on how we can help with these projects or on our “Risk Free” trial program, please contact a SafeSourcing Customer Service Representative.  We have an entire customer services team waiting to assist you today.

We look forward to your comments.

Strategic and Transactional Purchasing

Monday, July 8th, 2013

Today’s post is by Steve Schwerin, Account Manager at SafeSourcing.

Purchasing is often divided strategic and transactional.  I like these distinctions, because they help me hone in on the places where value is added in our field as things change.  There are certainly other ways to categorize spend.  One way of looking at strategic purchasing as distinct from transactional is that it deals with the non-commoditized.  Another is how it affects your core business.  This is not to say that it doesn’t deal in commodities.  Strategic purchasing is just something that needs to be dealt with a little more deftly, and as such, adds value to your firm in often intrinsic ways.

Not too long ago, I was watching a fascinating video clip on the “appliance boom.”  I had long heard of electronics booms, various industrial booms, the housing boom, the plastics boom and even the computer boom.  Forgotten in this mix was the appliance boom, yet there was a very real appliance boom back in the early 20th century as electricity became more of a household reality.  In the beginning of this phase, appliances were not something the average person often bought.  Households might have one washer and drier for years and a toaster was not a disposable item.  Appliances back then were actually screwed into light sockets since houses were not wired for appliances; they didn’t have electrical outlets.  In situations like this, knowing who you bought your appliance from and what brand it was were very important details.  Today, many appliances have become commoditized.  We buy the cheapest one with the most features.  Toasters and irons have become ubiquitous fixtures in our households.  Our situation today would have been hard to believe back then.  

What Changed?  Time?  Technology?  The sheer number of appliances on the market?  Regardless, lots of things that are more important to our well-being than a toaster were once strategic purchases, but have become transactional.  Details in business are always morphing, so continuing to purchase things in the same old way can be very costly.  Certain products that were once transactional purchases might even become strategic purchases as they become more critical to your central line of business or develop new features that are hard to place a value on.  The way you go about purchasing whether it be strategic or transactional may not only determine if you reach your savings targets, but how successful certain business endeavors are period.    Keeping an eye on which category each of your purchases currently falls into may be the beginning of keeping on top of savings opportunities as they come and go. 

For more information on how we can help you with your procurement needs or on our “Risk Free” trial program, please contact a SafeSourcing Customer Service Representative at 888-261-9070.  We have an entire customer services team waiting to assist you today.

There has never a better time to Source. Part II of II!

Wednesday, May 22nd, 2013

Today’s post is by Ron Southard, CEO at Safesourcing.

Once you have looked at the commodity markets to determine historical movement since you last sourced your category and the future outlook, the opportunity to drive your prices lower is also based on other factors such as the financial performance of the companies you may want to invite to participate including your incumbent supplier.

Using an example from EDAGR as we discussed yesterday for an unnamed supplier we have determined the following data. The unnamed supplier’s sales have risen consistently from 2010 through 2012. In particular, sales rose 19% from 2011 to 2012. Gross profit during the same period rose 44.8% and net income rose 90%. All of this is supported by an increase in unit sales of 26.6%. I know your next question, what does this mean?
1.   We’ve learned that even in the face of a slightly rising market which also has lower futures that your potential supplier was able to produce enviable numbers. Their Sales and Margins are both up so they have increased sales and reduced the cost (net income is up) of sales at the same time. This is a key indicator.

2.   As a result of the aforementioned numbers, it would indicate that they have room to move on price for selected customers if the new business is important to them or a net gain. Remember they still have to grow to please their shareholders. There is often margin set aside for winning new business and they are not the incumbent.

3.   Finding suppliers with these metrics of which there were several also suggests that your incumbent supplier may have to discount to a certain extent in order to keep your business. As such, an award here may help to avoid switching costs and make a slightly higher bid a better total deal, so do the math.

If you’d like to learn more about SafeSourcing spend analysis process please contact a SafeSourcing customer services representative.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments

Looking at Health and Wellness in a New Light

Monday, April 29th, 2013

Today?s post is by Mark Davis; Sr. Vice President and COO at SafeSourcing

A recent article in the Wall Street Journal headlined the methods by which Safeway expects to have a strong 2nd half of the year due to emphasis on new programs like their health and wellness initiative.? Safeway?s ?Live Life, Live Long, Live Well?? program has helped its employees and their families manage of the pieces of a healthier life and now they are expanding a variance of that program to their customers with all new healthy food options.? The Simple Nutrition, which will soon be available online, will allow customers to create a dietary program on their own focusing on characteristics like lowering their sodium or cholesterol.

Increasing profits, however, is just one of many reasons to explore a health and wellness program and in today?s blog we will be looking at a few areas that companies can begin exploring to source for their companies in order to achieve a healthier balance for their customers and employees.

Retailer Customer Wellness ? Retailers are choosing to focus on the types of offerings that will benefit their customers first, recognizing that by taking care of their customers, the rest of the business will fall in line.?? With Health and Wellness programs being a strong way to demonstrate this commitment it is no wonder that more companies are embracing them.? The keys to making the program work are to establish buy-in at the executive level that will help you organize a team that learn what is important to your customers.? Surveying your customers to find this out is a good method to learn this information.?

Once you know what is important to your customers you can tailor a program to meet those, whether it is new products, discounts, marketing, in-store cooking demonstrations or finding a 3rd party to partner with to help you develop the program.? Communicating this program effectively to your customers is the key to the success with success being measured by previously established metrics in advance.? All of these things can be done internally or with the assistance of 3rd party consultants.

Corporate Programs ? Focusing on your employees is just as important as focusing on your customers and is why many companies are looking at the long-term cost benefits of having a healthier team.? Whether you are partnering with your health insurance provider or a 3rd party medical consultant, there are many entities who are capable of working with your HR team to develop staged approaches to achieving a stronger and healthier group of employees.?

At the center of all of these programs is usually an internal website for employees to utilize resources developed to help them with weight loss, tobacco cessation, heart health, or even stress management, but the commitment to health and wellness goes beyond an intranet site.? By providing incentives for employees to get healthier, companies can drive down health care costs, increase productivity and morale and improve overall retention.? Companies like Lifeworks.com are available to help employers develop these types of programs.

At SafeSourcing we support many companies how are striving to develop health and wellness programs and vendors who can assist them in doing this and routinely help retailers and other industries in finding the right mix of services and vendors for their needs.? For more information on how we can help you, please contact a SafeSourcing Customer Service Representative.? We have an entire customer services team waiting to assist you today

We look forward to your comments.

Taking the proper time to prepare for your sourcing projects. The story of Ray and John Part IV

Friday, April 19th, 2013

Today?s post is by Mark Davis; Sr. Vice President and COO at SafeSourcing.

This week we are taking a look at how two procurement professionals approached the same containerboard project with their respective company.? Ray and John took different approaches to understanding the containerboard market, suppliers, and company atmosphere and were now prepared to start looking at the goals they wanted to achieve with their respective projects.

Ray would love to be able to source this containerboard project and consolidate his vendors, learn more about new vendors in the market and, of course, control his costs. Unfortunately he just doesn?t have the time to do it all.?

With the lack of time and the fact that his boss has been constantly talking with Ray about how the company can reduce their cost of goods, Ray has resigned himself to the fact that cost is the goal he is going to focus on during this event.? Ray knows that by focusing on cost alone that he will likely scare off new vendors who have no interest in investing time in a bidding war and that he will create some ill will with his current vendors, but he has limited? time? to invest on this project. As such, Ray spends the next few weeks on the phone and communicating through email with his incumbents trying to get them to reduce their costs, leaving the several divisions doing their own thing to continue with business as usual.

John, on the other hand, has chosen to invest some of his time with his company?s other departments and has made a name for himself within the company as someone who really is trying to understand the total picture relative to this and other categories.? This gives him the latitude to begin to investigate some potential goals that reach beyond cost of goods only and gives him the executive backing to pursue them.?

John knows that he needs to take a step I towards consolidating his vendors.? With so many divisions doing their own thing, he knows that? one goal of this project is to leverage the company?s overall spend and standardize on a process in order to help his company control total cost.? His plan to put part of the responsibility of this monitoring back with the vendor will create even greater potential savings and provide him with tools to show the results.?

John also knows that there are evolving programs within his company that will be affected positively by this project if he completes the due diligence in order to understand what each vendor can offer beyond just pricing.? The other departments probably never thought that containerboard spend would help them accomplish their new initiatives but John in understanding all of his companies initiatives understands the benefit that selecting the best overall vendor could provide his company.

John also realizes that at the end of the day reducing his cost of goods is still an important goal so he plans to invite several new vendors he has identified along his incumbents to participate in an online pricing gathering event.? This event that he will conduct through his eProcurement solutions provider will allow vendors to see and adjust their pricing based on their ranking in a way they see fit and feel comfortable with, but in a way that also benefits John?s company.? John is convinced that the investments and research he has done will pay big dividends in meeting new corporate initiatives, optimizing vendors and reducing his cost.

Stay tuned Monday as the final piece of the story of Ray and John unfolds.? You may be like Ray but desperately want to operate like John but without the staff or the time to dedicate at that level.

At SafeSourcing we understand Ray?s frustration and that is why our customer services team works with you to achieve great results while removing much of the work from your plate.? For more information on how we can help you with your sourcing projects, please contact a SafeSourcing Customer Service Representative.? We have an entire customer services team waiting to assist you today

We look forward to your comments.

HEY Procurement Senior Management; Are you thinking big enough?

Thursday, April 11th, 2013

Today’s post is by Ron Southard, CEO at SafeSourcing Inc.

I continue to think that most organizations and in fact most people don’t think big enough.  This includes CEO’s, CFO’s and many of the other C level professionals. However this is not limited to just executive leadership, it happens at every level of every organization. And the most troubling fact is that it happens with almost all people. So it is no surprise that it happens in procurement as well.

I have posted on a number of occasions the impact that I personally believe a procurement organization can have on the overall operating results of companies. For the most part this function within retail companies reports to a CFO, CPO or CLO, so the purview is at the highest level where it needs to be.

The following is an excerpt from a post on March 25th of 2011 titled Improving profitability 73% and why more companies don’t use reverse auctions and other e-procurement tools?

Assumptions:

1.  $150M Retail Company with industry average earnings of one percent or $1.5M.
2.  Cost of Goods (COGS) for this company is industry average of 70 percent or $105M.
3.  Company   agrees to source ten percent of their Cost of GOODS or roughly $11M.
4.  Company achieves below industry average savings of ten percent.
5.  Total savings generated  equals $1.1M
6.  Savings drops directly to the bottom or net profit.
7.  All other segments of the P&L perform to current fiscal plan
8.  All savings are recovered during the same fiscal year.
9.  Net profitability improves from $1.5M to $2.6M or a 73%.

Now let’s be realistic, all of the savings are not going to happen in the current fiscal year. With that said, we are only sourcing 10% of the total COGS. We achieved below industry average savings. No unforeseen costs that were not planned for eroded earnings. There will also be switching costs that may a erode some of the savings, but in today’s world they are not that significant.

If the above example is true, why are procurement departments not thinking big enough in order to chase this opportunity? If the company is publicly traded I would argue that there is not much else if anything that could drive similar operating results including acquisitions.

If you look back over many years, today’s bottom line of this industry is eerily similar. All the format changes, product mix changes, new technologies, specialization etc. have not materially improved the bottom line.

An argument from senior management might go like this! “We cannot maintain these savings year over year and our investors and other stakeholders are looking for sustainable results”. “As such, if we in fact deliver these results in the first year we will be penalized in subsequent years if we don’t deliver similar results”.

My rebuttal would be that in our example we only sourced 10% of the COGS. We did not touch expense. We did not put tools in place that would protect savings like a contract management solution. We did not strategize as to how to treat the categories being sourced so that we could take the category to market year after year in order to further compress or maintain cost.

This of course begs the question of how we might do just that. The first step is to think bigger, to believe that this is possible and then assign the resources to make it happen.

Maybe if JCPENNY had tried to execute this type of strategy their former CEO would still be there and all of his company stock would be worth a lot more than it is today.

Check back tomorrow and we’ll discuss how to think through a category strategically so that savings generated don’t erode over time regardless of the market conditions.

If you’d like to accomplish big results that stick, contact SafeSourcing.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

What’s in your Spend Management data model?

Wednesday, April 10th, 2013

Today’s post if by Ron Southard, CEO at SafeSourcing.

Someone said to me at some point in time that until at least you think that you know what you know; It’s not possible to even considering knowing what you don’t know. I’m sure the phrase has been represented in a number of different ways over the years.

The above is a really important thought to keep in mind if you are in the process of trying to identify what your spend management data model needs to look like.  Resultantly  turning the development of your data model over to  a DBA or Architect  that has no understanding of the procurement space,  processes or enabling data sources could  result in reporting that will break your  strategy before you event  get started.

Let’s take a look at a fairly simple example.

Any DBA even a low level one can speak at some level as to the construction of tables, rows and columns. With that said, they  probably are not  able to discuss their relationship with each other if they do not understand the procurement business, the categories being addressed or the supply base that supports the categories. This is where naming conventions can come into play early in the process and you need someone that knows what they are talking about. It’s pretty simple that across all vendors that an invoice is an invoice is an invoice. The data contained on the invoice like product or category identifiers or the lack thereof (pretty common) probably differs from vendor to vendor and will ultimately require normalization within your data model. However, at the end of the day an invoice is an invoice and the table that identifies them should be named such.  It sounds pretty simple, but there are many database implementations that do not return their perceived benefits due to simple issues of this nature.

The simple moral here is not to build a data base without the necessary governance from the business.

If you’d like to learn more about building your data model to support a more detailed understanding of your spend, please contact SafeSourcing.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments

 

SafeSourcing is great at eRFX execution, but what else do you do Part II

Friday, April 5th, 2013

A new program SafeSourcing has launched with our partner KPM Enterprises is called Strategic Cost Initiative (SCI).This is a very extensive program that addresses all functional areas within a company by assigning cost champions in every area that focus on collecting analyzing and improving processes that impact cost. This program is typically sponsored at the CEO and CFO level and delivered by individuals with extensive financial backgrounds including CFO’s.

Strategic Cost Initiative (SCI) tools and deliverables include but are not limited to the following

1. Cost Reductions
2. Expense Analysis
3. Budget Effectiveness Review
4. Supplier Billing Analysis
5. Zero-Based Budgeting
6. Cost/Benefit Analysis
7. Detailed Tracking/Monitoring Procedures

If you have any questions regarding SCI or other Safesourcing deliverables listed in “SafeSourcing is great at eRFX execution, but what else do you do Part I, please contact a SafeSourcing customer services account manager.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Farming the Low Hanging Fruit

Monday, February 25th, 2013

Today?s post is by Mark Davis; Sr. Vice President and COO at SafeSourcing.

There are many companies with large supply chain/procurement teams that have spent years going after the easy cost reduction/increased value or low hanging fruit.? Many companies, however, even very large companies have procurement staffs with barely enough bandwidth to monitor a portion of the overall spend.? For these companies, the need to look at low labor areas of spend is crucial and is a great place to start to focus on, especially if you have a strategic sourcing partner to work with.

Standardize the specification ? One way to quickly find ways to reduce costs, especially in companies where there many departments or locations, is the standardization of the basic purchases made.? By standardizing what your company buys you can achieve two things that will help in reducing cost.? First, you will ensure that groups are not buying at a price or quality level that is outside the norm of what the rest of the company is doing.? By standardizing the specification it is also easier to track how your company is doing against prices they should be getting.? This leads right into the second advantage which is being able to consolidate all of your spend in one bigger level that allows for stronger National or Regional contracts.? This may not add up to the company?s largest savings opportunities but they are not resource intensive and can be achieved quickly.

Quality Needs and Non-branded items ? In the process of standardizing the specifications for low hanging fruit categories, another way to affect more value is to evaluate whether the items being purchased fit the true needs of the organization.? Does your company need a $2,500/month multi-functional device when a $1,200 one will do?? This is also a time to determine whether the need for branded items could be replaced with non-branded items.? The quality of non-branded items such as generic drugs, paper products, and small appliances has increased greatly in the past few years and because of that companies are beginning to look more and more to non-branded products for their business needs.

Suppliers: too many, too long ? Maybe it?s not your products and services you want to change it is the fact that you have too many suppliers supplying the same thing or maybe you have a supplier who has been supplying you for years without any real accountability.? These are also examples of where a procurement department can get great increased value with little effort.? The reason for this is because you aren?t changing what you are purchasing and so you know the levels of spend and specification in advance.? Armed with that, it becomes a matter of consolidating your vendors or opening up the opportunity to new vendors as the case may be.? Either instance can provide very good results without having to change what you are purchasing at all.

If you are looking to put some attention on your low hanging fruit and find yourself without the resources to even go after that, please contact a SafeSourcing Customer Service Representative.? We have an entire customer services team waiting to assist you today.

We look forward to your comments.

Managed Service Provider Offerings you should consider ? Part IV of V

Thursday, February 21st, 2013

Today?s post is by Mark Davis; Sr. Vice President and COO at SafeSourcing.

This week we have been looking at the MSPMentor?s Top 100 (actually it was the top 501) providers and the associated trends in this space among the suppliers and their customers.? In particular, we are focusing on the most commonly offered services and what they may mean to your company and its profitability.

Mobile Device Management (74%*) ? Technology has completely consumed us when there are more people that know what BYOD means than BYOB but the facts are we live in a world full of mobile devices that are ingrained into our lives.? These devices need updates and need to be secured for their protection and the protection of the company when they are connected to the network.? These are the services that many MSPs are providing and are considerations few companies have spent much time thinking about.? They have desktops and laptops secured but have given virtually no thought to managing the mobile devices that occupy their network.

Vendor Management (74%*) ? Vendor management has been a popular service that many companies have been looking to MSPs more and more for.? National footprint companies in particular tend to think that they get good service when they let individual locations handle some services like janitorial or temporary labor services themselves.? The issue lies in how all of those vendors are monitored and managed to ensure that best practices and company SOPs are being followed.? This is just one way MSPs can help manage vendors.? Controlling rate cards, introducing new vendors and monitoring the performance of existing vendors are other important benefits companies can be looking to gain today.

Warranty Management (69%*) ? Warranty management is another area that has seen great growth as companies are moving toward a ONE NUMBER HELP DESK.? This concept replaces people?s long lists of people to call when there is a technical warranty issue with just one number.? Companies like Fine MSP offer their customers better faster support in a much easier one-call fashion.? Having a 3rd party MSP handle your warranty calls means your staff can continue back to their normal jobs with the peace of mind that the situation is being resolved on their behalf.

To understand more about how we can help you find vendors to meet some of these needs, please contact a SafeSourcing Customer Service Representative.? Please check back tomorrow as we finish the weeklong series? on MSP Services Review.

We look forward to your comments.

* Source: MSPmentor 501 Global Report, February 2013, all survey participants.