Archive for the ‘B2b Supply Chain’ Category

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

Supplier management may be your most important issue during a time of economic recovery.

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

In the Monday May 10th issue of USA TODAY the Money Section carried an article titled “Suppliers can?t meet demand” by Paul Davidson. The article went on to discuss that the economic rebound has been so robust that manufacturers are struggling so much with demand that it is causing huge bottlenecks in the supply chain. The article also went on to discuss that companies are reluctant to hire to meet the demand because they are not totally convinced that the current rebound will last.

The retail supply chain is something that this author has posted on dozens of times from the importance of a robust retail supply chain to how to manage your relationships with current and new sources of supply. A significant part of that is to have secondary and tertiary sources of supply that you can rely upon. By example, during the most recent H1N1 flu outbreak, Safesourcing was able to provide multiple sources of surgical mask suppliers to one of our customers that had not been able to find them elsewhere for sales in their stores. They did not know of these suppliers. They are also a very large company. Although this particular issue was caused by panic buying, it is still a supply and demand problem and correlates very well to the USA TODAY article. The message here is, don?t wait until a time of panic or increased prosperity to work and plan for spikes in the supply chain that may cause your customers pain.

Following are five Safesourcing blog posts from 2008 that should provide some good base reading on this subject.

1.?Is critical thinking in supplier selection a key to quality auctions? You bet!
2.?Supplier Open Communication. A key to high quality e-procurement events.
3.?Supplier-selection-this-may-be-the-most-important-decision-you-make
4.?What is retail supply base management?
5.?What is the benefit of a large retail supplier database and how do companies use the data to support growing their spend with reverse auctions?

The SafeSourceIt? Retail Supplier Database contains over 380,000 vetted suppliers.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments

Posted in , , ,

Safesourcing Inc. completes a successful year two.

Friday, May 7th, 2010

It hardly seems possible that we launched our company two years ago. At the time there were indicators for those paying attention of trouble in the global economy but know one had any idea just how bad it was going to get. In hindsight what a time to launch a company. When customers and business partners asked me why, my response was if you are doing what you believe in and the results you promise are true, then there really is no bad time to launch a business.

Our promise has been the same from day one, to reduce the cost of goods and services regardless of a company?s size or the size of the category being sourced. And, while doing so improve quality, safety and environmental focus. Today, two years later our customers will attest to the fact that we have held true to that promise.

Following is a short list of accomplishments that we are very proud of.

1.?Over 700 educational blog posts relative to e-procurement issues of importance.
2.?Over 1500 useful procurement related wiki terms and definitions.
3.?Added an average of more than one new customer for every month in business.
4.?Grew our supplier data base to greater than 380,000 retail suppliers
5.?Sourced 100?s of categories from commodities to finished goods and services.
6.?Sourced categories as small as $5K with savings > 30%.
7.?Sourced categories as high as $80M.
8.?Never held an e-negotiation event that did not result in savings.
9.?Conducted every process in e-procurement including RFI, RFP and RFQ.
10.?Installed our product in Asia in a multi lingual implementation.
11.?Averaged over 24% savings over two years.
12.?Developed a unique process for sourcing small spends for the retail mid market.
13.?Grew our database to over a terabyte of data.
14.?Helped companies source with environmental and social consciousness
15.?Today released SafeContract? a fully featured hosted Contract Management System.

To our customers thank you for your support. We endeavor to earn your business every day. To our business partners thank you for your guidance during a tough economic period. To the retail industry our goal is to be your best vehicle for reducing costs and improving earnings with an increased focus on corporate social responsibility.

Thank You.

Posted in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Hey retailers; how green are your suppliers? You can not manage something that you do not measure.

Tuesday, April 27th, 2010

When we think about safety and eco standards relative to our supplier partners, I honestly believe that retailers say quietly to themselves; how are we supposed to monitor this with everything else we have to deal with in procuring products?

This issue becomes more complex when you consider that data may be required from your organization relative to your existing suppliers, data from your supplier as to their own interpretation of their adherence and practice and finally other external data that neither organization may have.

Reflecting on safety, the question that retailers should ask all suppliers old or new is pretty simple. What certifications do you carry relative to food safety such as Safe Quality Foods (SQF), Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI), American Humane Certified and others? Another area to question should be regarding USDA and FDA inspection history.

Although Green Initiatives fall into the social consciousness area of a company, there are a variety of questions that can be asked in this area as well such as Green Seal, Eco-logo and Green Star certifications and participation in other partnerships that are environmentally focused.

A source that may make it easier for retailers would be to rely on their e-procurement solutions providers for this data if the provider has it included in their portfolio such as a supplier database. E-procurement specification templates can act as a form of scorecard for existing suppliers and potential news sources of supply if they are used as a repository for database queries relative to the above subject matter. This can become a type of automated RFI process which can save retailers a lot effort when trying to find additional sources of supply or when trying to drive cost down with existing suppliers. These data may also help to protect retailers from harmful litigation when products end up not being as safe as promised.

Can your e-procurement solutions provider provide these types of data on demand as a normal byproduct of your standard e-procurement process?

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Posted in , , , , , , , , , ,

Do suppliers benefit from participation in e-negotiation events such as reverse auctions?

Friday, April 23rd, 2010

A discussion followed relative to incumbent suppliers view and how long the retailer had been doing business with them vs. the opinion of new sources of supply. In general most vendors in the space would come up with many of the same points listed below. Please read on.

SafeSourcing Inc. places a great deal of value in our SafeSourceIt? Retail Supplier Database of over 380,000 retail suppliers located throughout the world. Additionally we also place a great deal of value on each individual supplier regardless of their size. We believe that well thought out next generation e-procurement tools can provide significant benefits to buyers and suppliers whether they are hosting or participating in e-procurement events.?

Some but certainly not all benefits that suppliers can anticipate from SafeSourcing are:
?
1. An easy to use e-procurement tool limited to a single page view where a supplier can be completely comfortable that their company?s best foot is being put forward to the soliciting company.

2. An increase in new business opportunities through engagements they would otherwise not be exposed to.

3. Clean data about the soliciting company and an accurate listing of their event guidelines, specifications, terms, conditions and other information necessary to build an accurate and successful pricing strategy.

4. Best practice training in event participation and strategy development.

5. A clear focus on what?s important beyond price in next generation e-procurement tools such as supplier safety certifications and practices as well as their environmental programs that will differentiate them from other suppliers.

6. Closed loop same day reporting of results of the specific e-procurement event a supplier participates in as well as a detailed supplier feedback questionnaire report.

7. Significant time savings associated with new business development that becomes more and more costly based on fluctuating markets..

8. Industry pricing trends extrapolated from their view of low quote information during the event if allowed by the soliciting company.

9. Use of these tools for their own procurement needs.

It sure does not sound like a bad deal to this author as long as it is explained correctly and supported by the retailer as their way of automating their procurement process and record keeping.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Posted in , , , , , ,

Supplier scoring may provide Key Performance Indicators to the future.

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

Quality supplier selection is one of the most important areas of focus in order to insure quality and sustainability in the e-negotiation process.

Having a large database of available suppliers to drive sustainable results in e-procurement events such as reverse auctions is a critical success factor. Maybe even more critical is making sure that the suppliers once selected for participation in an event are of the highest quality, professional, responsive and have your best interests at heart. There are several areas in the early strategy stages of a reverse auction which if properly monitored can be leading key performance indicators as to future performance. These KPI?s are, the initial supplier response and supplier training schedule adherence. If suppliers are not interested enough during these early stages, that may be an indicator of future performance in other more critical areas such as on time delivery, back order management and documentation.

A simple process for measuring these KPI?s would be to measure the number of days between the project start date or initial supplier contact and the event start date, where the supplier has been sent an invitation but has not responded either positively or negatively. Maintaining an active status of response dates could be scored based on the number of days it takes invited suppliers to respond. Obviously the longer it takes to respond the lower KPI score the supplier would receive. Another possible KPI measurement or filter once the invitation has been accepted would be the number of days between the date accepted and the event start date, where the supplier has accepted an invitation but has not completed their training.

These are not intended to be punitive measures. In most cases suppliers will perform beyond your expectations. Sustainability and quality require measurements regardless of how simple.

As always we appreciate and look forward to your comments.

Posted in , ,

If I save and you save shouldn’t we all save?

Monday, April 12th, 2010

Historically this author has heard the buzz phrase that this is a” win win situation” far too often because far to little thought is put in to what it should really mean. As such when I do hear it, it makes me want to puke. What we should be doing is focusing on win-win-win relationship in the supplier-buyer-consumer supply chain model.

E-negotiation tools offer benefits to both suppliers and hosting retail companies which should also provide a benefit to consumers if the retailer and supplier are savvy enough to figure it out. Some but not all to consider follow.

1. Suppliers have an opportunity to bid on business they might otherwise not know about.
2. Forces retailers to formalize their specifications for further use.
3. Retailers are exposed to far more sources of supply than they were previously aware of.
4. Focuses the buyer-seller relationship on a fair trade approach to conducting business
5. The best total solution based on more than just price generally rises to the top.
6. Focuses both suppliers and buyers on reducing their net landed costs for products and services.
7. Unbundles costs to reveal and eliminate hidden costs that provide little or no value
8. Creates a competitive and balanced marketplace.
9. Offers a lesson that in cost cutting those suppliers should use with their raw material suppliers.
10. Collectively provides an opportunity for improved margins and earnings
11. Provides a tool to offer products to consumers that are of better quality, safer and at a lower price.

If this is not win-win-win, someone is not paying attention. Even though I still don’t like the buzz word.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Posted in , , , , , , , ,

If I save and you save shouldn?t we all save?

Monday, April 12th, 2010

Historically this author has heard the buzz phrase that this is a? win win situation? far too often because far to little thought is put in to what it should really mean. As such when I do hear it, it makes me want to puke. What we should be doing is focusing on win-win-win relationship in the supplier-buyer-consumer supply chain model.

E-negotiation tools offer benefits to both suppliers and hosting retail companies which should also provide a benefit to consumers if the retailer and supplier are savvy enough to figure it out. Some but not all to consider follow.

1.?Suppliers have an opportunity to bid on business they might otherwise not know about.
2.?Forces retailers to formalize their specifications for further use.
3.?Retailers are exposed to far more sources of supply than they were previously aware of.
4.?Focuses the buyer-seller relationship on a fair trade approach to conducting business
5.?The best total solution based on more than just price generally rises to the top.
6.?Focuses both suppliers and buyers on reducing their net landed costs for products and services.
7.?Unbundles costs to reveal and eliminate hidden costs that provide little or no value
8.?Creates a competitive and balanced marketplace.
9.?Offers a lesson that in cost cutting those suppliers should use with their raw material suppliers.
10.?Collectively provides an opportunity for improved margins and earnings
11.?Provides a tool to offer products to consumers that are of better quality, safer and at a lower price.

If this is not win-win-win, someone is not paying attention. Even though I still don?t like the buzz word.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Posted in , , , , , , , ,

Retailers need to think it through before trying a do it yourself program when it comes to e-negotiation or e-procurement

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

This author has met with many large companies that are using e-sourcing suites or tools provided by some of the largest names in the industry. After we have reviewed what we do and how we do it and then compare what they are accomplishing the following question always comes up. Why are you generating significantly higher savings than we are?

The answer is pretty simple in most cases. You have bought a software suite or tools and rather than using them as designed you have just incorporated your old practices into new tools. In addition, further training or access to your supplier?s data in the form of sources of supply etc. was not included in your initial cost.

A full service solution provider should be able to create, execute and support all auction activity including but not limited to the following.

1.?Assistance in selecting Auction categories
2.?Market insight
3.?Determine the timing of category auction
4.?Identification of potential quality suppliers in addition to existing
5.?Building on-line auctions
6.?Supplier contacts and training
7.?Execution of live bids
8.?Trouble shooting during live bids
9.?Compiling and communicating reports within 24 hours
10.?Award and Non-Award notifications to Suppliers
11.?Providing ongoing customer support
12.?Monitoring Supplier performance
13.?Feedback from Retailers/Suppliers
14.?Analyze the quality of each auction

The above deliverables if not executed in a self service program will result in less than maximum results and potentially failure of your program.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Posted in , , , , , , , , , ,

A procurement lesson! The CPSC issues Guidance on Repairing Homes with Problem Drywall from China.

Monday, April 5th, 2010

Last year I posted on offshore sourcing and the related problem of homes built with drywall from China. Now the CPSC has issued guidance as to what consumers should do. You can bet that this is not the end of this story. The first question I would be asking is who my contractor bought the drywall from in this country.

Inez Tenenbaum of the Consumer Product Safety Commission told the Associated Press, ?We want families to tear it all out and rebuild the interior of their homes, and they need to start this to get their lives started all over again.?

Below are some procurement recommendations:

1. Verify the name and address of the supplier or suppliers and their manufacturing addresses, phone numbers, email addresses and fax number. Conduct a cross-reference search of this information and the company name against other supply chain sites

2. Only deal with a company that has a specific company address and other professionally listed contact information.

3. Place multiple calls to the supplier at their provided contact numbers over a period of time and inquire about their company and the primary contacts. Ask for a management breakdown and to speak with at least two members of senior management.

4. Ask for references in the USA or another developed country that you will be doing business with.

5. Inform the supplier that you will be visiting their location for an office/factory tour. There are a number of third parties that can conduct a background checks on your behalf. These companies also have reference reports available. They are well worth the small associated cost.

6. Never agree to any up front payment without a sample or test of the products to be procured. These pre-shipment inspections are a must for any new supplier. You want to ensure that the goods are of adequate quality before placing or accepting any new products.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Posted in , , , , , ,

Part II of II. Is critical thinking in supplier selection a key to quality and sustainable retail reverse auctions?

Friday, April 2nd, 2010

Continuing from Part I of II Is critical thinking in supplier selection a key to quality and sustainable retail reverse auctions?

The following scenario offers one example as to how the careful management of your suppliers and a little strategic thinking can drive the type of results you desire as well as a long term sustainable process.

Suppliers will almost always not be of the same size. This does not mean however that they are not of the same quality. Smaller vendors that have accepted your invitation will most likely bid early during your event and then drop out after the early rounds. These suppliers will most likely not agree to participate in the future as they consider their chances of winning the business unrealistic. This too is manageable however back to our first premise. Suppliers that finish first or second or your incumbent that may have been replaced will in most cases agree to participate again, but? a lack of new competition will make the auctions less successful.

Thinking more strategically, an apparently logical question might be… If we only have six suppliers available how many should we invite to participate the first time and is more always better over the long run? Should we invite them all? Every company will answer this question differently. When considering the future, do we want successful early events or would we like a continual process improvement that drives continuous savings?

There are several possible solutions to consider. One scenario might be to only invite four participants to your first event. This will create a competitive environment for your reverse auction. After all it only takes two suppliers both interested in your business to drive quality results. Now back to our story. Let?s make the assumption that in twelve months or in the next purchasing cycle when you wish to repeat this auction that the two largest suppliers from the previous event agree to return. You could now invite supplier?s number five and six that were not included in the original auction. You have now created a competitive auction for the second year or purchasing cycle. An additional thought might be to not invite all of the largest suppliers to your first reverse auction, in order to manage the quality of your suppliers for future auctions. This type of critical thinking supports continual process improvement in e-procurement implementations.

We look forward to and appreciate your comments.

Posted in , , , , , , , , ,

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »
© 2025 SafeSourcing